The software development process for most companies has a flow – gather requirements, design, implement, test, release. There can be feedback loops, iterative cycles, spirals or waterfalls, but they all have these steps. When teams “freeze the code” and submit to test, they are creating their own mini-ice age and dooming themselves to extinction.
Prioritization / Process Improvement / Requirements / Software development / Software requirements specification
Posted on:
Prioritizing Software Requirements – Kano Take Two
In our previous post on Kano requirements classification, we introduced the concepts and showed how to apply them. One of our readers commented privately that we didn’t show how to use the techniques for prioritization. We’ll do that in this post.
Prioritization / Process Improvement / Requirements / Software development / Software requirements specification
Posted on:
Prioritizing Software Requirements With Kano Analysis
We’ve talked before about three ways to prioritize software requirements. We’ve also talked about incorporating risk analysis into ROI calculations for requirements. In this post we will look at how Kano analysis can be applied to prioritizing requirements.
Process Improvement / Reviews / Software development / Software Reviews
Posted on:
OnTime Bug tracking software – $5 (or free) from Axosoft
Seriously.
There’s a crazy deal being offered by Axosoft. Buy a 5-user version of their $500 software suite for $5, but the offer expires February 24th. The link to buy the software is here – and only available on blogs. Axosoft is trying a social marketing experiment to see if they can promote their products and brand via the blog universe. It isn’t clear at what hour the offer expires, so you might want to get it on the 23rd.
Communication / Process Improvement / Requirements / ROI / Software development / Software requirements specification
Posted on:
Software Requirements Specification Iteration and Prototyping
Developing great software requirements demands iteration
In our previous post of an example of the software development process, we showed a linear flow through the process, as depicted in several posts over a couple weeks. What we failed to show was any of the iteration cycles, as Deepak points out by asking a great question in the comments on that post. In this post, we will show a little more about how the process works by showing how iteration fits into the machinery of software development.
Process Improvement / Requirements / Software development / Software requirements specification / Test Automation / Testing / Use Cases / UX
Posted on:
Software development process example
We’ve presented an example of the software development process across several posts over the last two weeks. In this post we tie them all together, showing the steps in process order.
Process Improvement / Software development
Posted on:
The evolution of software product development
The Lost Garden has an outstanding post by Danc – Software Development’s Evolution towards Product Design.
Danc writes about how the software development process has evolved over the years. He characterizes this evolution in four distinct phases.
Design / Process Improvement / Software development / Test Automation / Testing
Posted on:
Software Testing Series: Organizing a Test Suite with Tags Part Three
This is the third in a three-part post about using tags as a means to organize an automated unit test suite.
Part 3 of this post can be read as a standalone article. If it were, it would be titled Design elements of an automated unit test framework using tags. If you’re only reading this post and not parts 1 and 2, pretend that this is the title.
Process Improvement / Slightly off-topic
Posted on:
Outside reading: correlation and causality
A while ago, we asked you to send us links to good blogs. Jeff Kinsey sent us a link to his blog, Ski’s throughput on command. We found this post on logical thinking processes which is good. Thanks Ski for sending us the link!
Their post discusses the differences between causality and correlation of events.