2008 Pragmatic Marketing Survey Results: Part 1

Pragmatic Marketing’s Annual Product Management and Marketing Survey Results – 2008

We’ve started our analysis of the over 1000 responses to this year’s survey. Thanks again to Pragmatic Marketing for allowing people in the community to analyze the data. Let’s dive in…

Past Surveys

Here are the results that Pragmatic Marketing compiled from previous surveys.

• 2000 Survey Results.
• 2001 Survey Results.
• 2002 Survey Results.
• 2003 Survey Results.
• 2004 Survey Results.
• 2005 Survey Results.
• 2006 Survey Results.
• 2007 Survey Results.
• 2008 Survey Results.

We have also looked for insights in previous year’s data:

• 2007 – Management Salaries
• 2007 – Technical Product Managers
• 2006 – Role Details (how much time you spend doing what)
• 2006 – Gender Bias in Compensation
• 2006 – Staffing Models
• 2006 – Compensation vs. Other Factors

As the survey has evolved over the years, the questions have been refined and the number of respondents has grown. This affords us the opportunity to really get some insight into the world that is product management.

How Many People Responded to the 2008 Survey?

There were 1087 people who responded to the 2008 survey – 393 women and 694 men. Not all of them are product managers, however. Here’s the breakout of respondents by self-reported title and sex.

[click for larger version]

Presumably, all of the respondents are somewhere in the “product management zone” – either managing or working with product managers and product marketing managers. Otherwise, they probably wouldn’t respond to a survey by Pragmatic Marketing.

2008 Compensation Levels By Title

Reviewing compensation across this entire body of people really can prevent us from gaining insights about the job market for any particular role. Compensation was reported in this survey as a combination of salary and bonus. We’ll look at the data in terms of total compensation.

Note: In this, and all compensation analyses, we remove data that might identify a respondent to their peers. Imagine that a female designer mentions to her product manager friend that she has responded to the survey. If we were to show compensation data for designers, split by sex, that product manager would know what compensation our designer friend had reported. We don’t want that. Since there was only one Analyst / PR respondent, we filtered that out of the data.

A handful of people also reported $0 or $1000 salaries – we removed that data as well. These filters are the reason you may see different min/max/average values from different analyses of this data set.

All compensation data is in US dollars, as was specified in the original survey questions.

Here’s how minimum, maximum, and average total compensation break out by reported title for 2008.

[click for larger version]

No big surprises in that executives and directors make more than everyone else. The ranges in reported total compensation are larger than I would have suspected. This may reflect increased international participation in the survey versus previous years. Smaller ranges are probably to be found in any particular (regional) market. More analysis is needed to see if the data supports this hypothesis.

The product managers, with 486 responses in the survey, provide us with the most interesting population to study.

2008 Product Manager Surveyed Compensation

While there is still more work to do, if you’re a product manager, you can look at the following graph and see how your compensation compares with the respondents who self-identified as product managers in Pragmatic Marketing’s 2008 survey.

[click for larger version]

The blue bars in the histogram above represent the number of responses in each range of total compensation (values in black on the left vertical axis indicate # of respondents). For example, 51 product managers reported total compensation in 2008 of between $91,875 and $99531. [Note: the non-rounded numbers were selected by Excel automatically to provide “usable” insights into the data, and I didn’t feel like over-riding the defaults].

Note that this diagram does reflect that 6 product managers (just over 1%) elected to not report total compensation.

The red line represents cumulative percentage of product managers reporting at or below a dollar amount for total compensation. This is useful for determining your percentile rank among survey respondents. You do that by

1. Finding where your total compensation would be for 2008 along the horizontal axis
2. Tracing straight up until you hit the red curve
3. Tracing to the right from that red curve until you reach the right axis on the chart
4. Estimating the percentage relative to the (red) numbers on the scale.

This estimated percentage tells you what percent of product managers (who responded to the survey) reported lower total compensation than you. As an example, a product manager that earned $125,000 in 2008 would have earned more than approximately 75% of the survey respondents. Depending on what you earn, this is either great ammo for a conversation with your boss, or something you hope she hasn’t seen.

Conclusion

We’ll look at additional slices of the data for product managers in upcoming articles.

[Update] Adam Bullied just posted his first analysis of agile versus non-agile product managers in the data.