Archive of Writing Articles
May 6th, 2009

Pictures can convey messages much more powerfully than words. In a recent discussion about writing whitepapers, I suggested combining the idea-creation advice from Made To Stick with the image-creation advice from Back of The Napkin. Check out this article to see some concrete examples.

Posted in Book Reviews, Business Analysis, Communication, Product Management, Reviews, Writing | 11 Comments »
September 3rd, 2008

An effective status report is one that
- Instantly conveys the state of the project.
- Creates a minimum of overhead for the project team.
- Gets you help when you need it, and latitude when you don’t.
- Is fun / energizing to the author and the readers.
An effective status report is not a myth, it is actually easy to achieve.
Read the rest of the article…

Posted in Communication, Consulting, Project Management, Writing | 8 Comments »
August 6th, 2008

Having trouble working through complex concepts? Struggling to get a “simple” message across? As human beings, we are all pre-wired to absorb visual communication. You should take advantage of that to give yourself an edge when it comes to communicating.
Read the rest of the article…

Posted in Communication, Presentation, Writing | 2 Comments »
May 27th, 2008

The Cause and Effect diagram is also known as a fish bone diagram, because it resembles the skeleton of a fish. Using a cause and effect diagram can be the most effective way to define the problems that you intend to solve with your product. Get your stakeholders engaged in your program with this compelling visual!
Read the rest of the article…

Posted in Business Analysis, Communication, Ishikawa Diagram, Product Management, Requirements, Requirements Models, Writing | 6 Comments »
November 5th, 2007

A rose by any other name…
When we’re learning how to write in high school and college, we’re taught that synonyms make our writing more exciting. In fact, not using synonyms can make our prose clumsy and awkward.
When it comes to requirements, the last thing you want to do is use synonyms. Except sometimes.
Read the rest of the article…

Posted in Business Analysis, Communication, Consulting, Requirements, Writing | 2 Comments »
September 11th, 2007

Separation of business rules from requirements is a good thing. Not because of semantic distinctions, but because it allows you to write better software, write it faster, and change it more easily. This article is a response to an excellent comment on our recent article about hidden business rules. Thanks for challenging the idea – it either eliminates it from discourse or makes it stronger, and we all benefit. Here’s an attempt to make it stronger.
Read the rest of the article…

Posted in Business Analysis, Business Rules, Communication, Consulting, Requirements, Writing | 9 Comments »
March 7th, 2007
Effective communication of requirements requires more than documentation and broadcasting. Effective communication requires interaction and collaboration. Alistair Cockburn addresses this in his analysis of project successes and modes of communication.
Posted in Business Analysis, Communication, Consulting, Presentation, Requirements, Writing | 2 Comments »
January 5th, 2007
You knew it would happen eventually, the big ten rules of writing requirements has become the big twelve rules. Maybe scope creep isn’t such a bad thing after all. Writing style plays an important role in writing requirements too.
Posted in Business Analysis, Product Management, Requirements, Writing | 4 Comments »
December 4th, 2006
We talk about characteristics of good requirements, including completeness, correctness, and ambiguity. But how do we assure that our requirements are complete, correct, and unambiguous? Simple, Captain, with logic.
Posted in Communication, Requirements, Writing | No Comments »
November 20th, 2006
Pair programming is a bit of a foreign concept for many people in business. A few years ago, it was foreign to most programmers too. Pair programming is a powerful technique for software development because it allows two people to look at the same problem/solution from two different perspectives at the same time. Would that same approach work for business analysis?
Posted in Business Analysis, Requirements, Writing | 3 Comments »