Archive of Requirements gathering Articles

Just Plain BadLameAverageGoodGreat (6 votes, average: 4.67 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
March 13th, 2007

How To Visualize Stakeholder Analysis

The first step of gathering requirements is to identify who can give you the requirements. Business processes include communication between different people inside the organization. Communication also includes people outside the organization. When gathering requirements, it can be easy to overlook the people who don’t use the software directly. Those people may still be stakeholders. Read on to see how to approach stakeholder analysis.

Just Plain BadLameAverageGoodGreat (3 votes, average: 4.33 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
January 11th, 2007

The Wisdom of Crowds Prevents People’s Passions

The wisdom of crowds helps us avoid stupid decisions. Unfortunately, it also prevents innovative, passionate, fantastic decisions. Collective Intelligence is collective insipidness. We need to keep the inputs of individuals in the mix.

Just Plain BadLameAverageGoodGreat (Be The First to Rate This Article)
Loading ... Loading ...
December 8th, 2006

Prototype Fidelity

Prototyping is invaluable for getting feedback on a design. It is also great for getting validation of requirements. It can even be used as a means to document the requirements. What level of fidelity should be used when getting feedback? Jan Miksovsky provides some guidance from the real world.

Just Plain BadLameAverageGoodGreat (1 votes, average: 4 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
December 6th, 2006

Idea Seeding Better Than Brainstorming

Kevin Cheng and Tom Chi, at OK/Cancel have written an article sharing the creative process they use for creating their awesome strips. Idea seeding is the process where they use time constraints and design/refine cycles to improve their ability to create quality “product.” They also wonder about extending this approach to other areas where brainstorming is normally used.

Just Plain BadLameAverageGoodGreat (2 votes, average: 2.5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
December 1st, 2006

Foundation Series: JAD Sessions

JAD is an acronym that stands for Joint Application Design. JAD sessions are collaborative meetings where the customers meet with developers to determine what the product needs to be or do.

Just Plain BadLameAverageGoodGreat (8 votes, average: 4.75 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
November 21st, 2006

Ten Requirements Gathering Techniques

The BABoK (Business Analyst Body of Knowledge) lists 10 techniques for gathering requirements. Here’s an overview of each one. For more details, check out the latest Guide to the BABoK.

Just Plain BadLameAverageGoodGreat (3 votes, average: 4.33 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
November 17th, 2006

Gathering Implicit Requirements

Johanna Rothman just wrote an article titled Implicit Requirements are Still Requirements. She points out that her expectations were not met, even though her needs might have been. Johanna also implicitly begs the question - how do we gather implicit requirement?

Just Plain BadLameAverageGoodGreat (4 votes, average: 4.25 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
November 13th, 2006

6 Tips To Double Your Requirements Interview Effectiveness

Being effective at interviewing is key to gathering requirements effectively. We suggest six tips to make the interviewing process more effective and efficient.

Just Plain BadLameAverageGoodGreat (1 votes, average: 1 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
November 9th, 2006

Requirements Context

Understanding someone’s perspective on requirements requires that you appreciate the context in which they’ve formed that perspective. Not everyone is playing the same game on the same field.

Just Plain BadLameAverageGoodGreat (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
November 6th, 2006

Interrelation Digraphs As Prioritization Tool

Prioritization can be hard, especially when we’re dealing with a lot of variables. Peter Abilla, at shmula.com takes a fairly esoteric tool (interrelation digraphs) and applies it as a prioritization tool. Opthamologists have learned that they can’t show us a bunch of blurry images and have us tell them which one looks the best, and then prescribe a corrective lense. They have to ask us “Is it better like this? Or better like this?” Peter’s approach does the same thing, but with a quantitative edge.