<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Modeling User Competency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tynerblain.com/blog/2009/10/13/modeling-user-competency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2009/10/13/modeling-user-competency/</link>
	<description>Software product success.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:39:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Sehlhorst</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2009/10/13/modeling-user-competency/comment-page-1/#comment-534745</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Sehlhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/?p=1084#comment-534745</guid>
		<description>Hey Michael, thanks and welcome to Tyner Blain!

I haven&#039;t checked out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0470084111/tynerblain-20&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;About Face 3&lt;/a&gt; yet - did you read 2 or 1?  How does 3 compare?

Really interesting idea about using suitability (to users at a given competence level) as an aspect of competitive analysis - I love it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Michael, thanks and welcome to Tyner Blain!</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t checked out <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0470084111/tynerblain-20" rel="nofollow">About Face 3</a> yet &#8211; did you read 2 or 1?  How does 3 compare?</p>
<p>Really interesting idea about using suitability (to users at a given competence level) as an aspect of competitive analysis &#8211; I love it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Dubakov</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2009/10/13/modeling-user-competency/comment-page-1/#comment-532265</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Dubakov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/?p=1084#comment-532265</guid>
		<description>Very interesting article. I read About Face 3 book recently and liked the idea to design for Competent users.  We are re-designing TargetProcess now with this in mind. 

Also I see this as an interesting approach to evaluate competitors. We may ask people to do same tasks in various products and compare results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting article. I read About Face 3 book recently and liked the idea to design for Competent users.  We are re-designing TargetProcess now with this in mind. </p>
<p>Also I see this as an interesting approach to evaluate competitors. We may ask people to do same tasks in various products and compare results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-10-20 &#8226; Bare Identity</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2009/10/13/modeling-user-competency/comment-page-1/#comment-531298</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-10-20 &#8226; Bare Identity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/?p=1084#comment-531298</guid>
		<description>[...] Modeling User Competency and Expertise &#124; Tyner Blain &quot;By treating any “using the software to do something” interactions as a process, you can measure the cost (how long it takes) of the user’s interactions. Applying the math behind experience curves, you can predict the reduction in cost (to your users) over time, for any set of interactions. Experience curves take into account that some processes are inherently more learnable than others. This property of learnability is reflected as an efficiency coefficient – how efficiently someone can learn ways to reduce the cost (time) needed to perform the interactions.&quot; (tags: usability ux tynerblain usercompetency scottsehlhorst) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Modeling User Competency and Expertise | Tyner Blain &quot;By treating any “using the software to do something” interactions as a process, you can measure the cost (how long it takes) of the user’s interactions. Applying the math behind experience curves, you can predict the reduction in cost (to your users) over time, for any set of interactions. Experience curves take into account that some processes are inherently more learnable than others. This property of learnability is reflected as an efficiency coefficient – how efficiently someone can learn ways to reduce the cost (time) needed to perform the interactions.&quot; (tags: usability ux tynerblain usercompetency scottsehlhorst) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Sehlhorst</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2009/10/13/modeling-user-competency/comment-page-1/#comment-531181</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Sehlhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 04:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/?p=1084#comment-531181</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Ski!  Pinged you in email.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Ski!  Pinged you in email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKI</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2009/10/13/modeling-user-competency/comment-page-1/#comment-531115</link>
		<dc:creator>SKI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/?p=1084#comment-531115</guid>
		<description>I would! Call me.  --ski</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would! Call me.  &#8211;ski</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links for Oct 18 2009 &#124; Eric D. Brown - Technology, Strategy, People, Projects</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2009/10/13/modeling-user-competency/comment-page-1/#comment-530921</link>
		<dc:creator>Links for Oct 18 2009 &#124; Eric D. Brown - Technology, Strategy, People, Projects</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/?p=1084#comment-530921</guid>
		<description>[...] Modeling User Competency by Scott Sehlhorst on Tyner Blain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Modeling User Competency by Scott Sehlhorst on Tyner Blain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Sehlhorst</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2009/10/13/modeling-user-competency/comment-page-1/#comment-530123</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Sehlhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/?p=1084#comment-530123</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Andrew - great stuff!  Reminds me a lot of this article on inductive user interfaces (versus a UI where the user has to &lt;i&gt;deduce&lt;/i&gt; what to do).  &lt;a href=&quot;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms997506.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms997506.aspx&lt;/a&gt;

It also sounds like you experienced something with similar impact as collaborative effects - there&#039;s an interesting article in the Harvard Business Review about how collaborative learning can accelerate / invalidate the projected learning rate defined by experience curves. &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/bigshift/2009/04/introducing-the-collaboration.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/bigshift/2009/04/introducing-the-collaboration.html&lt;/a&gt;.

Great real-world data too, I&#039;m sure it will help other folks here!  I appreciate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Andrew &#8211; great stuff!  Reminds me a lot of this article on inductive user interfaces (versus a UI where the user has to <i>deduce</i> what to do).  <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms997506.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms997506.aspx</a></p>
<p>It also sounds like you experienced something with similar impact as collaborative effects &#8211; there&#8217;s an interesting article in the Harvard Business Review about how collaborative learning can accelerate / invalidate the projected learning rate defined by experience curves. <a href="http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/bigshift/2009/04/introducing-the-collaboration.html" rel="nofollow"> </a><a href="http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/bigshift/2009/04/introducing-the-collaboration.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/bigshift/2009/04/introducing-the-collaboration.html</a>.</p>
<p>Great real-world data too, I&#8217;m sure it will help other folks here!  I appreciate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Meyer</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2009/10/13/modeling-user-competency/comment-page-1/#comment-529893</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/?p=1084#comment-529893</guid>
		<description>Fascinating and timely information for me.  We are doing a reengineering project with a company that is implementing an ERP/CRM system.  They were are photocopier/file cabinet type of company.  

Over the strenuous objections of the vendor, we created entirely new interfaces for the users.  Only things users would be required to do were presented and they were all in one menu and labeled in terms users knew. For example:
Enter Billing
My Billings
My Late Customers

Then we wrote &quot;How To&quot; guides with pictures walking users through each step with pictures.  Again the ERP/CRM vendor strenuously complained that users should &quot;discover&quot; new ways of doing tasks.  At this point we fired all the vendors consultants.

It all seemed unnecessarily simple to the vendor and they hated that we renamed everything and created non-standard forms.  However, by greatly simplifying the interface and defining precise processes for everything we wanted users to do, we moved the whole company from &quot;novice&quot; to what the vendor would call &quot;expert&quot;.  There definiation of expert was based on what one could expect a standard user to be able to do and how long it would take to get them there.  

In 2 months, we had created a star/example consultant. Sheis 67 years old, doesn&#039;t own a computer or cell phone, but she is loading documents into our portal for distribution to our clients and having clients return documents to her through our portal.  This is in addition to billing, tracking and updating customer information.

Basic training that defines what &quot;competent&quot; is and gives precise steps that novice, inexperienced or resistant users can follow can really raise the bar of productivity and performance.  Just one example presents this benefit.  Our company distributes 4 to 6 documents a year to 6,000 clients and it costs $4 to ship a document one way.  We will cut our shipping costs by about two-thirds and pay for the system in its first year.

Thanks for a great theoretical presentation of what we were doing for practical purposes without thinking about the theoretical underpinnings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating and timely information for me.  We are doing a reengineering project with a company that is implementing an ERP/CRM system.  They were are photocopier/file cabinet type of company.  </p>
<p>Over the strenuous objections of the vendor, we created entirely new interfaces for the users.  Only things users would be required to do were presented and they were all in one menu and labeled in terms users knew. For example:<br />
Enter Billing<br />
My Billings<br />
My Late Customers</p>
<p>Then we wrote &#8220;How To&#8221; guides with pictures walking users through each step with pictures.  Again the ERP/CRM vendor strenuously complained that users should &#8220;discover&#8221; new ways of doing tasks.  At this point we fired all the vendors consultants.</p>
<p>It all seemed unnecessarily simple to the vendor and they hated that we renamed everything and created non-standard forms.  However, by greatly simplifying the interface and defining precise processes for everything we wanted users to do, we moved the whole company from &#8220;novice&#8221; to what the vendor would call &#8220;expert&#8221;.  There definiation of expert was based on what one could expect a standard user to be able to do and how long it would take to get them there.  </p>
<p>In 2 months, we had created a star/example consultant. Sheis 67 years old, doesn&#8217;t own a computer or cell phone, but she is loading documents into our portal for distribution to our clients and having clients return documents to her through our portal.  This is in addition to billing, tracking and updating customer information.</p>
<p>Basic training that defines what &#8220;competent&#8221; is and gives precise steps that novice, inexperienced or resistant users can follow can really raise the bar of productivity and performance.  Just one example presents this benefit.  Our company distributes 4 to 6 documents a year to 6,000 clients and it costs $4 to ship a document one way.  We will cut our shipping costs by about two-thirds and pay for the system in its first year.</p>
<p>Thanks for a great theoretical presentation of what we were doing for practical purposes without thinking about the theoretical underpinnings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Sehlhorst</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2009/10/13/modeling-user-competency/comment-page-1/#comment-529892</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Sehlhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/?p=1084#comment-529892</guid>
		<description>Great article, Paul!  Here&#039;s the permalink, in case bit.ly ever goes the way of the dodo &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2007/12/the-perpetual-super-novice.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2007/12/the-perpetual-super-novice.php&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, Paul!  Here&#8217;s the permalink, in case bit.ly ever goes the way of the dodo <a href="http://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2007/12/the-perpetual-super-novice.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2007/12/the-perpetual-super-novice.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Sherman</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2009/10/13/modeling-user-competency/comment-page-1/#comment-529880</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Sherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/?p=1084#comment-529880</guid>
		<description>Great stuff Scott! I have a related article at UXmatters magazine: &quot;The Perpetual Super-Novice&quot; article. Link is here: http://bit.ly/I8j05</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff Scott! I have a related article at UXmatters magazine: &#8220;The Perpetual Super-Novice&#8221; article. Link is here: <a href="http://bit.ly/I8j05" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/I8j05</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
