<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: APR: Initial Prototype Progress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tynerblain.com/blog/2007/05/01/apr-prototype-update-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2007/05/01/apr-prototype-update-1/</link>
	<description>Software product success.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:10:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Sehlhorst</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2007/05/01/apr-prototype-update-1/comment-page-1/#comment-93731</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Sehlhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 18:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2007/05/01/apr-prototype-update-1/#comment-93731</guid>
		<description>Hey Rolf, thanks for asking some great questions.

Articles are being implemented before ratings because my domain model of ratings is that they are &quot;created by users, about articles&quot; - so having an article to rate (or review) needed to be implemented before I could implement the rating or reviewing.  

An only registered users can create articles, so Users has been implemented before / concurrently with articles.  We need to have some users logged into the system and submitting articles in order for the rest of the users to be able to browse them.

I think the very first prototype may only have the &quot;our niche&quot; top level area - I really want to get it out tomorrow (Saturday at the latest).  I am leaning towards areas being pre-defined (like digg).  In that case, it may make it into the first prototype.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Rolf, thanks for asking some great questions.</p>
<p>Articles are being implemented before ratings because my domain model of ratings is that they are &#8220;created by users, about articles&#8221; &#8211; so having an article to rate (or review) needed to be implemented before I could implement the rating or reviewing.  </p>
<p>An only registered users can create articles, so Users has been implemented before / concurrently with articles.  We need to have some users logged into the system and submitting articles in order for the rest of the users to be able to browse them.</p>
<p>I think the very first prototype may only have the &#8220;our niche&#8221; top level area &#8211; I really want to get it out tomorrow (Saturday at the latest).  I am leaning towards areas being pre-defined (like digg).  In that case, it may make it into the first prototype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolf</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2007/05/01/apr-prototype-update-1/comment-page-1/#comment-93703</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 15:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2007/05/01/apr-prototype-update-1/#comment-93703</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott, 

you wrote about the sequence of things you develop: users, then articles, then ratings. Here&#039;s my somewhat methodologic question, just because I&#039;m curious:
Why do you start with users? And why do you put ratings after articles?
The prioritization of the use cases gives me &quot;browse an area&quot;, &quot;suggest an article&quot;, and &quot;comment an article&quot; as the winners. I don&#039;t believe you really need users for these three. Also, the next thing after articles should be comments.
I understand you need articles with areas in order to browse them, so the second prio could be transformed in a function that is implemented first: suggest an article. Once you can suggest, you can prowse and and you can comment.
Please expand on this a bit. Cheers to your Ruby skills anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott, </p>
<p>you wrote about the sequence of things you develop: users, then articles, then ratings. Here&#8217;s my somewhat methodologic question, just because I&#8217;m curious:<br />
Why do you start with users? And why do you put ratings after articles?<br />
The prioritization of the use cases gives me &#8220;browse an area&#8221;, &#8220;suggest an article&#8221;, and &#8220;comment an article&#8221; as the winners. I don&#8217;t believe you really need users for these three. Also, the next thing after articles should be comments.<br />
I understand you need articles with areas in order to browse them, so the second prio could be transformed in a function that is implemented first: suggest an article. Once you can suggest, you can prowse and and you can comment.<br />
Please expand on this a bit. Cheers to your Ruby skills anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

