<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: APR: Prioritizing Use Cases &#8211; Vote Three Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tynerblain.com/blog/2007/04/25/apr-prioritizing-use-cases-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2007/04/25/apr-prioritizing-use-cases-1/</link>
	<description>Software product success.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:10:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger L. Cauvin</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2007/04/25/apr-prioritizing-use-cases-1/comment-page-1/#comment-93730</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger L. Cauvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 18:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2007/04/25/apr-prioritizing-use-cases-1/#comment-93730</guid>
		<description>Did you ever come up with an iteration plan?  What will be there deliverables at the end of each iteration?  Are you time-boxing your iterations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever come up with an iteration plan?  What will be there deliverables at the end of each iteration?  Are you time-boxing your iterations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Sehlhorst</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2007/04/25/apr-prioritizing-use-cases-1/comment-page-1/#comment-90914</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Sehlhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2007/04/25/apr-prioritizing-use-cases-1/#comment-90914</guid>
		<description>Note: If you think the current prioritization is a good one, feel free to vote anyway as a means of validating the thoughts above.  Or just add a comment here if you would rather type a little than click six times.  :)

Or if you think this is an awkward way to get and give feedback, let me know and we&#039;ll try something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note: If you think the current prioritization is a good one, feel free to vote anyway as a means of validating the thoughts above.  Or just add a comment here if you would rather type a little than click six times.  :)</p>
<p>Or if you think this is an awkward way to get and give feedback, let me know and we&#8217;ll try something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

