<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vote Early And Often &#8211; Getting Value From Brainstorming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/27/getting-value-from-brainstorming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/27/getting-value-from-brainstorming/</link>
	<description>Software product success.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:10:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Sehlhorst</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/27/getting-value-from-brainstorming/comment-page-1/#comment-55243</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Sehlhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/27/getting-value-from-brainstorming/#comment-55243</guid>
		<description>Thanks Timothy, both for your post, and for checking out ours.  And thanks for the kind words.  Hope you&#039;ll stick around!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Timothy, both for your post, and for checking out ours.  And thanks for the kind words.  Hope you&#8217;ll stick around!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Johnson</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/27/getting-value-from-brainstorming/comment-page-1/#comment-55242</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/27/getting-value-from-brainstorming/#comment-55242</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Scott.  You analyzed a great comparison between the techniques and further advanced the idea that &quot;there&#039;s more than one way to skin a cat.&quot;  Personally, the approach I covered is a favorite because it tends to appeal to all three learning styles:  audio (who get to hear the discussion and vocalize their ideas during brainstorming), visual (who see the results of the brainstorming and the voting), and kinesthetic (who get to stand up and physically touch their votes).  Too often we forget that we have different types of people in our rooms, each of whom need to buy into ideas.  Wonderful post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Scott.  You analyzed a great comparison between the techniques and further advanced the idea that &#8220;there&#8217;s more than one way to skin a cat.&#8221;  Personally, the approach I covered is a favorite because it tends to appeal to all three learning styles:  audio (who get to hear the discussion and vocalize their ideas during brainstorming), visual (who see the results of the brainstorming and the voting), and kinesthetic (who get to stand up and physically touch their votes).  Too often we forget that we have different types of people in our rooms, each of whom need to buy into ideas.  Wonderful post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

