Comments on: Before And After – A Rule For Improving Processes http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/19/before-and-after/ Software product success. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:57:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: Scott Sehlhorst http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/19/before-and-after/comment-page-1/#comment-55211 Scott Sehlhorst Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:36:56 +0000 http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/19/before-and-after/#comment-55211 Happy to link, Nils! Thanks for writing it - I love good ideas. They say the best ideas are the ones that, when seeing them for the first time, make you say "well, duh!". Scott Happy to link, Nils! Thanks for writing it – I love good ideas. They say the best ideas are the ones that, when seeing them for the first time, make you say “well, duh!”.

Scott

]]> By: Nils http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/19/before-and-after/comment-page-1/#comment-55210 Nils Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:24:17 +0000 http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/19/before-and-after/#comment-55210 Scott - thanks for mentioning my "three boxes" entry. I think your abstraction of it into a reengineering exercise is excellent. Certainly any process (e.g., either "B" itself or the process it sits within "A->B->C") are fair game for improvement. Nils Scott – thanks for mentioning my “three boxes” entry. I think your abstraction of it into a reengineering exercise is excellent. Certainly any process (e.g., either “B” itself or the process it sits within “A->B->C”) are fair game for improvement.

Nils

]]>