<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BPMN Compensation Event Correction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/18/bpmn-compensation-correction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/18/bpmn-compensation-correction/</link>
	<description>Software product success.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:39:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Deysi</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/18/bpmn-compensation-correction/comment-page-1/#comment-553455</link>
		<dc:creator>Deysi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/18/bpmn-compensation-correction/#comment-553455</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m new using BPMN 2.0 and it is also first time I&#039;m using a Blog.
I have a naive question. What is the difference between using the TASK &quot;receiving an E-mail&quot; and the INTEMEDIATE EVENT that also make reference to a received message.

Thanks a lot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m new using BPMN 2.0 and it is also first time I&#8217;m using a Blog.<br />
I have a naive question. What is the difference between using the TASK &#8220;receiving an E-mail&#8221; and the INTEMEDIATE EVENT that also make reference to a received message.</p>
<p>Thanks a lot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Sehlhorst</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/18/bpmn-compensation-correction/comment-page-1/#comment-510146</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Sehlhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/18/bpmn-compensation-correction/#comment-510146</guid>
		<description>Hey Augusto, thanks.  No, I&#039;ve never tried ARIS, sorry.  Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Augusto, thanks.  No, I&#8217;ve never tried ARIS, sorry.  Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Augusto</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/18/bpmn-compensation-correction/comment-page-1/#comment-510006</link>
		<dc:creator>Augusto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/18/bpmn-compensation-correction/#comment-510006</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,
very interesting your text.
I&#039;m doing some tests with ARIS Business Architect and I am having some problems to simulate a BPMN diagram with compensation intermediate event. Have you ever tried ARIS?
Regards,
Augusto</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,<br />
very interesting your text.<br />
I&#8217;m doing some tests with ARIS Business Architect and I am having some problems to simulate a BPMN diagram with compensation intermediate event. Have you ever tried ARIS?<br />
Regards,<br />
Augusto</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New and Notable 114 : Sam Gentile's Blog</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/18/bpmn-compensation-correction/comment-page-1/#comment-463853</link>
		<dc:creator>New and Notable 114 : Sam Gentile's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/18/bpmn-compensation-correction/#comment-463853</guid>
		<description>[...] continues his excellent BPMN series with BPMN Compensation Event Correction and BPMN Diagrams - Sequence [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] continues his excellent BPMN series with BPMN Compensation Event Correction and BPMN Diagrams &#8211; Sequence [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Sehlhorst</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/18/bpmn-compensation-correction/comment-page-1/#comment-167964</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Sehlhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/18/bpmn-compensation-correction/#comment-167964</guid>
		<description>Hey Callum, thanks for commenting, and welcome to Tyner Blain!

I think that is an excellent question.  I trumped up this example to demonstrate how a compensation works, not to show that a compensation is the best solution for this process.

That said, I think using a compensation here maintains a clear connection between the rescinding and the recording of the transaction.  In a more complex process, this association would be more beneficial.

I could be convinced either way, for this particular process example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Callum, thanks for commenting, and welcome to Tyner Blain!</p>
<p>I think that is an excellent question.  I trumped up this example to demonstrate how a compensation works, not to show that a compensation is the best solution for this process.</p>
<p>That said, I think using a compensation here maintains a clear connection between the rescinding and the recording of the transaction.  In a more complex process, this association would be more beneficial.</p>
<p>I could be convinced either way, for this particular process example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Callum Bell</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/18/bpmn-compensation-correction/comment-page-1/#comment-167894</link>
		<dc:creator>Callum Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/18/bpmn-compensation-correction/#comment-167894</guid>
		<description>The corrected solution seems unnecessarily complex. Why not avoid compensations altogether and fork from the no at the gateway to the &quot;record transaction recission&quot; task.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The corrected solution seems unnecessarily complex. Why not avoid compensations altogether and fork from the no at the gateway to the &#8220;record transaction recission&#8221; task.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Gentile : New and Notable 114</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/18/bpmn-compensation-correction/comment-page-1/#comment-55527</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Gentile : New and Notable 114</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/09/18/bpmn-compensation-correction/#comment-55527</guid>
		<description>[...] SOA, WCF, BPM, Workflow, Microsoft Share this post: Email it! &#124; bookmark it! &#124; digg it! &#124; reddit!&#124; kick it!       _uacct = &quot;UA-531207-1&quot;; urchinTracker();     Published Tuesday, September 19, 2006 12:16 PMby SamGentile Filed under WCF/Indigo, ASP.NET, LINQ and OR/M, Software Architecture, SOA, New and Notable, Data, Agile and Extreme Programming, Avalon/WPF [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SOA, WCF, BPM, Workflow, Microsoft Share this post: Email it! | bookmark it! | digg it! | reddit!| kick it!       _uacct = &#8220;UA-531207-1&#8243;; urchinTracker();     Published Tuesday, September 19, 2006 12:16 PMby SamGentile Filed under WCF/Indigo, ASP.NET, LINQ and OR/M, Software Architecture, SOA, New and Notable, Data, Agile and Extreme Programming, Avalon/WPF [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
