<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BPMN Diagrams &#8211; Wait For An Intermediate Timer Event</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/08/25/bpmn-intermediate-timer1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/08/25/bpmn-intermediate-timer1/</link>
	<description>Software product success.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:10:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Sehlhorst</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/08/25/bpmn-intermediate-timer1/comment-page-1/#comment-54773</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Sehlhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 16:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/08/25/bpmn-intermediate-timer1/#comment-54773</guid>
		<description>A question from a reader:  &quot;I don&#039;t understand the solid line in the contractor pool between Submit Inv and Rec&#039;v Pmt..  Seems there should be no line because the contractor has nothing to do with that process.  Am I close?&quot;

Good question about the connector.  One thing about BPMN is that within each pool, the process is as it appears to the owner of the pool.  From the contractor&#039;s perspective, he submits an invoice and gets paid.  The same way that he would throw a ball up and catch it.  The fact that there is something else affecting the sequence of events is irrelevant to the contractor.  His process (as far as he knows) is to get paid, if he submits the invoice, without having to do anything else.  The messages (dashed lines) between the swim lanes indicate that the process involves communication, and lets anyone reviewing the diagram appreciate exactly what it is that &quot;someone else&quot; has to do.

BPMN is good that way, in that you can view the process from either participant&#039;s perspective, and overall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question from a reader:  &#8220;I don&#8217;t understand the solid line in the contractor pool between Submit Inv and Rec&#8217;v Pmt..  Seems there should be no line because the contractor has nothing to do with that process.  Am I close?&#8221;</p>
<p>Good question about the connector.  One thing about BPMN is that within each pool, the process is as it appears to the owner of the pool.  From the contractor&#8217;s perspective, he submits an invoice and gets paid.  The same way that he would throw a ball up and catch it.  The fact that there is something else affecting the sequence of events is irrelevant to the contractor.  His process (as far as he knows) is to get paid, if he submits the invoice, without having to do anything else.  The messages (dashed lines) between the swim lanes indicate that the process involves communication, and lets anyone reviewing the diagram appreciate exactly what it is that &#8220;someone else&#8221; has to do.</p>
<p>BPMN is good that way, in that you can view the process from either participant&#8217;s perspective, and overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

