<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foundation Series: Business Process Modeling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/07/18/foundation-series-business-process-modeling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/07/18/foundation-series-business-process-modeling/</link>
	<description>Software product success.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:40:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kinaze</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/07/18/foundation-series-business-process-modeling/comment-page-1/#comment-575156</link>
		<dc:creator>kinaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/07/18/foundation-series-business-process-modeling/#comment-575156</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Business Process Modeling http://bit.ly/c4Omto&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Business Process Modeling <a href="http://bit.ly/c4Omto" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/c4Omto</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Sehlhorst</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/07/18/foundation-series-business-process-modeling/comment-page-1/#comment-109553</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Sehlhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/07/18/foundation-series-business-process-modeling/#comment-109553</guid>
		<description>Hey Asmi, thanks for reading and asking the question!

Sorry - I&#039;m not familiar with the Catalyst approach - maybe someone else here is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Asmi, thanks for reading and asking the question!</p>
<p>Sorry &#8211; I&#8217;m not familiar with the Catalyst approach &#8211; maybe someone else here is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asmi Ali</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/07/18/foundation-series-business-process-modeling/comment-page-1/#comment-109046</link>
		<dc:creator>Asmi Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/07/18/foundation-series-business-process-modeling/#comment-109046</guid>
		<description>Hi
Can anyone highlight, what’s the significant difference (if any) in BPMN and Process chart(Catalyst approach) for process modeling?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
Can anyone highlight, what’s the significant difference (if any) in BPMN and Process chart(Catalyst approach) for process modeling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Sehlhorst</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/07/18/foundation-series-business-process-modeling/comment-page-1/#comment-54554</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Sehlhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 01:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/07/18/foundation-series-business-process-modeling/#comment-54554</guid>
		<description>Hey Glen, thanks for reading and commenting!

Unfortunately, I don&#039;t have any experience with the Rummler Brache approach, so can&#039;t give an experienced-based opinion.  I also searched the web for tutorials or examples of RB diagrams - but couldn&#039;t find any (not that there are many BPMN examples either).

Does RB allow for the looping constructs and more expressive decisions (gateways) that BPMN supports?  The only RB diagram I saw looked like a simple flowchart that had been mapped into swimlanes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Glen, thanks for reading and commenting!</p>
<p>Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t have any experience with the Rummler Brache approach, so can&#8217;t give an experienced-based opinion.  I also searched the web for tutorials or examples of RB diagrams &#8211; but couldn&#8217;t find any (not that there are many BPMN examples either).</p>
<p>Does RB allow for the looping constructs and more expressive decisions (gateways) that BPMN supports?  The only RB diagram I saw looked like a simple flowchart that had been mapped into swimlanes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen B. Alleman</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/07/18/foundation-series-business-process-modeling/comment-page-1/#comment-54531</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen B. Alleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 04:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/07/18/foundation-series-business-process-modeling/#comment-54531</guid>
		<description>Scott,

I must have missed the BPM bus. I&#039;ve always used the Rummer Brache notation which is supported in Visio and comes along with their book on &quot;managing the white space in the organizaiton.&quot;

From your experience, what&#039;s the significant difference (if any) in BPM and Rummler Brache for process modeling?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>I must have missed the BPM bus. I&#8217;ve always used the Rummer Brache notation which is supported in Visio and comes along with their book on &#8220;managing the white space in the organizaiton.&#8221;</p>
<p>From your experience, what&#8217;s the significant difference (if any) in BPM and Rummler Brache for process modeling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/07/18/foundation-series-business-process-modeling/comment-page-1/#comment-54448</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 07:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/07/18/foundation-series-business-process-modeling/#comment-54448</guid>
		<description>Good post and a great one page introduction to BPM. 

I&#039;ve recently talked to both a BPM vendor and a Business Process Analyst. What really struck me in the conversation is that they deal in at a much higher process level. From this and some papers from Gartner, I&#039;ve learned very little of BPM ends up at the level of a traditional use case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post and a great one page introduction to BPM. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve recently talked to both a BPM vendor and a Business Process Analyst. What really struck me in the conversation is that they deal in at a much higher process level. From this and some papers from Gartner, I&#8217;ve learned very little of BPM ends up at the level of a traditional use case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
