<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Office 2007 UX Victory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/04/07/office-2007-ux-victory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/04/07/office-2007-ux-victory/</link>
	<description>Software product success.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:10:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Sehlhorst</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/04/07/office-2007-ux-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-738</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Sehlhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 18:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/04/07/office-2007-ux-victory/#comment-738</guid>
		<description>Yeah, me too.  I bet the video creates tons of SMB and consumer sales.  From what I understand, most of the money in Office (previously) has come from corporate site-licenses.  This may change the nature of the game.

I think (non-techie) small businesses have to have Quickbooks, WinXP, and &quot;some office application&quot; to survive.  Now they will want Office 2007, just because of the time it saves them.

I loved the one commenter on the Channel9 thread who tracked his reactions relative to the timestamp in the video.  He starts out hostile, and ends up as a likely customer.

Thanks for reading, and for the comment, Tom!
Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, me too.  I bet the video creates tons of SMB and consumer sales.  From what I understand, most of the money in Office (previously) has come from corporate site-licenses.  This may change the nature of the game.</p>
<p>I think (non-techie) small businesses have to have Quickbooks, WinXP, and &#8220;some office application&#8221; to survive.  Now they will want Office 2007, just because of the time it saves them.</p>
<p>I loved the one commenter on the Channel9 thread who tracked his reactions relative to the timestamp in the video.  He starts out hostile, and ends up as a likely customer.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading, and for the comment, Tom!<br />
Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/04/07/office-2007-ux-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 14:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/04/07/office-2007-ux-victory/#comment-736</guid>
		<description>Wow.  I was skeptical, but you&#039;re right, that is extraordinarily compelling, and firmly moves me into the &quot;gotta have the upgrade&quot; camp.

What do you think the ROI on that video is?  $500MM?  Talk about time well-spent for a group of UX designers and program managers!

-- Tom &quot;until recently, happy Office 2000 user&quot; Wilbur</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  I was skeptical, but you&#8217;re right, that is extraordinarily compelling, and firmly moves me into the &#8220;gotta have the upgrade&#8221; camp.</p>
<p>What do you think the ROI on that video is?  $500MM?  Talk about time well-spent for a group of UX designers and program managers!</p>
<p>&#8211; Tom &#8220;until recently, happy Office 2000 user&#8221; Wilbur</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

