<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Definition of sunk cost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/24/definition-of-sunk-cost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/24/definition-of-sunk-cost/</link>
	<description>Software product success.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:10:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Sehlhorst</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/24/definition-of-sunk-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-860698</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Sehlhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/24/definition-of-sunk-cost/#comment-860698</guid>
		<description>Thanks Girum, and welcome to Tyner Blain!

To answer your questions,
&lt;ol&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Sunk cost should not be included in the analysis of the project because none of the choices you are considering making can change if that money has already been spent - do the project or don&#039;t do it, you&#039;ve already spent the money.&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;&quot;Pre-operating cost&quot; can include both investments you&#039;ve already made (sunk cost) and investments you haven&#039;t made yet, that have to be made before you start operations.  Any money you haven&#039;t spent yet should still be considered.&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Well, my point is that it &lt;i&gt;shouldn&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; be included, but it often is.  It is a mistake to do it, even though many people still do.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Girum, and welcome to Tyner Blain!</p>
<p>To answer your questions,</p>
<ol>
<li>Sunk cost should not be included in the analysis of the project because none of the choices you are considering making can change if that money has already been spent &#8211; do the project or don&#8217;t do it, you&#8217;ve already spent the money.</li>
<li>&#8220;Pre-operating cost&#8221; can include both investments you&#8217;ve already made (sunk cost) and investments you haven&#8217;t made yet, that have to be made before you start operations.  Any money you haven&#8217;t spent yet should still be considered.</li>
<li>Well, my point is that it <i>shouldn&#8217;t</i> be included, but it often is.  It is a mistake to do it, even though many people still do.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: girum</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/24/definition-of-sunk-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-860690</link>
		<dc:creator>girum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/24/definition-of-sunk-cost/#comment-860690</guid>
		<description>it is a good ways of expressing sunk cost .But the question is
1.why sunk cost is not included in economic analysis of the project?
2.is sunk cost mean pre operating cost ?
3.iif sunk cost is not included in financial and economic analysis why we bother about it ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is a good ways of expressing sunk cost .But the question is<br />
1.why sunk cost is not included in economic analysis of the project?<br />
2.is sunk cost mean pre operating cost ?<br />
3.iif sunk cost is not included in financial and economic analysis why we bother about it ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/24/definition-of-sunk-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 23:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/24/definition-of-sunk-cost/#comment-595</guid>
		<description>Good discussion of sunk cost. In most companies, the points you make under the &quot;There’s usually more at stake here&quot; section are in full effect. As a result, most of the time it is not strictly a financial decision at all. Rather, the &quot;non financial&quot; factors play the critical role - for better or worse!

- Michael
http://michael.HighTechProductManagement.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good discussion of sunk cost. In most companies, the points you make under the &#8220;There’s usually more at stake here&#8221; section are in full effect. As a result, most of the time it is not strictly a financial decision at all. Rather, the &#8220;non financial&#8221; factors play the critical role &#8211; for better or worse!</p>
<p>- Michael<br />
<a href="http://michael.HighTechProductManagement.com/" rel="nofollow">http://michael.HighTechProductManagement.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

