<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Definition of payback period</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/19/definition-of-payback-period/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/19/definition-of-payback-period/</link>
	<description>Software product success.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:10:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/19/definition-of-payback-period/comment-page-1/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 06:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/19/definition-of-payback-period/#comment-498</guid>
		<description>Scott,

I believe payback period is almost always the wrong metric to use. It may have some value for those focused on very short-term results, but that&#039;s about it.

A company should be run for the long run, and so should the projects funded. NPV, IRR, ROI are all good measures - but not payback period. In my opinion, the only time it should be even looked at is (like you said) as a tie-breaker for projects with the same ROI or NPV.

- Michael
http://michael.HighTechProductManagement.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>I believe payback period is almost always the wrong metric to use. It may have some value for those focused on very short-term results, but that&#8217;s about it.</p>
<p>A company should be run for the long run, and so should the projects funded. NPV, IRR, ROI are all good measures &#8211; but not payback period. In my opinion, the only time it should be even looked at is (like you said) as a tie-breaker for projects with the same ROI or NPV.</p>
<p>- Michael<br />
<a href="http://michael.HighTechProductManagement.com/" rel="nofollow">http://michael.HighTechProductManagement.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Sehlhorst</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/19/definition-of-payback-period/comment-page-1/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Sehlhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/19/definition-of-payback-period/#comment-482</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a comment I just received in email.  Thanks for sending!:

Great idea to add the payback period.  I&#039;ve seen it used so many more times than ROI, especially at the mid-management level.  The mid managers that I&#039;ve worked with have very short term vision.  They would choose measures that make them look good in a short period of time and that are easy to demonstate.  After all, that&#039;s what goes on the annual review...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a comment I just received in email.  Thanks for sending!:</p>
<p>Great idea to add the payback period.  I&#8217;ve seen it used so many more times than ROI, especially at the mid-management level.  The mid managers that I&#8217;ve worked with have very short term vision.  They would choose measures that make them look good in a short period of time and that are easy to demonstate.  After all, that&#8217;s what goes on the annual review&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

