<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Software testing series: Pairwise testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/18/software-testing-series-pairwise-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/18/software-testing-series-pairwise-testing/</link>
	<description>Software product success.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 12:04:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Sehlhorst</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/18/software-testing-series-pairwise-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-113560</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Sehlhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/18/software-testing-series-pairwise-testing/#comment-113560</guid>
		<description>Thanks for reading, and glad that the advice helps.  PWT can be very powerful as a component in a testing plan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for reading, and glad that the advice helps.  PWT can be very powerful as a component in a testing plan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: product testing</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/18/software-testing-series-pairwise-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-113415</link>
		<dc:creator>product testing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/18/software-testing-series-pairwise-testing/#comment-113415</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;product testing...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>product testing&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Sehlhorst</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/18/software-testing-series-pairwise-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-3460</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Sehlhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 15:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/18/software-testing-series-pairwise-testing/#comment-3460</guid>
		<description>Nawab, thanks for commenting.  You might want to take a look at an article I just published at developer.star.  It provides much more detail on pairwise testing, and the context of using it.  It should provide you with what you might need for your presentation.

http://www.developerdotstar.com/mag/articles/test_smarter_not_harder.html

Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nawab, thanks for commenting.  You might want to take a look at an article I just published at developer.star.  It provides much more detail on pairwise testing, and the context of using it.  It should provide you with what you might need for your presentation.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.developerdotstar.com/mag/articles/test_smarter_not_harder.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.developerdotstar.com/mag/articles/test_smarter_not_harder.html</a></p>
<p>Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nawab</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/18/software-testing-series-pairwise-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-3458</link>
		<dc:creator>Nawab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 13:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/18/software-testing-series-pairwise-testing/#comment-3458</guid>
		<description>I need some Power Point Presentation for Pairwise Testing related to Computer Field
Your&#039;s is a good web Page but not realted to my requirement</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need some Power Point Presentation for Pairwise Testing related to Computer Field<br />
Your&#8217;s is a good web Page but not realted to my requirement</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Sehlhorst</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/18/software-testing-series-pairwise-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-3158</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Sehlhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 15:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/18/software-testing-series-pairwise-testing/#comment-3158</guid>
		<description>Chris, thanks for commenting and welcome to Tyner Blain!

With four years of PWT experience, do you find that N-wise is too much effort (marginal benefit over pairwise testing)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, thanks for commenting and welcome to Tyner Blain!</p>
<p>With four years of PWT experience, do you find that N-wise is too much effort (marginal benefit over pairwise testing)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Meisenzahl</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/18/software-testing-series-pairwise-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-3157</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meisenzahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 14:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/03/18/software-testing-series-pairwise-testing/#comment-3157</guid>
		<description>Great stuff, thanks. I&#039;ve beeb a proponent of PWT for maybe 4 years now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff, thanks. I&#8217;ve beeb a proponent of PWT for maybe 4 years now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

