<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Software Testing Series: Black Box vs White Box Testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/01/13/software-testing-series-black-box-vs-white-box-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/01/13/software-testing-series-black-box-vs-white-box-testing/</link>
	<description>Software product success.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:39:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George Kurien</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/01/13/software-testing-series-black-box-vs-white-box-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-54505</link>
		<dc:creator>George Kurien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/01/13/software-testing-series-black-box-vs-white-box-testing/#comment-54505</guid>
		<description>O.k</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O.k</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyner Blain &#187; Foundation series: Unit testing software</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/01/13/software-testing-series-black-box-vs-white-box-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyner Blain &#187; Foundation series: Unit testing software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/01/13/software-testing-series-black-box-vs-white-box-testing/#comment-111</guid>
		<description>[...] There is a downside to system testing. In the long run, it&#8217;s more expensive than unit testing. In our Software testing series post on blackbox and whitebox testing we discuss several tradeoffs associated with the different types of testing. For most organizations, the best answer is to do both kinds of testing - do some of each. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There is a downside to system testing. In the long run, it&#8217;s more expensive than unit testing. In our Software testing series post on blackbox and whitebox testing we discuss several tradeoffs associated with the different types of testing. For most organizations, the best answer is to do both kinds of testing &#8211; do some of each. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techie</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/01/13/software-testing-series-black-box-vs-white-box-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Techie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2006/01/13/software-testing-series-black-box-vs-white-box-testing/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Hi,

The post is very informative, especially the pros and cons of Black and White Box Testing.
Keep it up.

- Techie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>The post is very informative, especially the pros and cons of Black and White Box Testing.<br />
Keep it up.</p>
<p>- Techie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
