<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Managing requirements conversations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tynerblain.com/blog/2005/12/27/managing-requirements-conversations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2005/12/27/managing-requirements-conversations/</link>
	<description>Software product success.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 14:59:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyner Blain &#187; Document proliferation</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2005/12/27/managing-requirements-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyner Blain &#187; Document proliferation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2005/12/27/managing-requirements-conversations/#comment-115</guid>
		<description>[...] Many people get so frustrated with all of these different ways to document requirements that they either look for a novel approach (or another here), or declare that requirements are counter-productive. The problem gets exacerbated when a bunch of former technologists attend a training class and start preaching the importance of (pick one of the docs above) without an understanding of the big picture. The current software-development outsourcing trend in the US has forced a lot of people to scramble to find new homes in the org chart. Cote&#8217; is spot-on with his application of Conway&#8217;s law to this problem. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Many people get so frustrated with all of these different ways to document requirements that they either look for a novel approach (or another here), or declare that requirements are counter-productive. The problem gets exacerbated when a bunch of former technologists attend a training class and start preaching the importance of (pick one of the docs above) without an understanding of the big picture. The current software-development outsourcing trend in the US has forced a lot of people to scramble to find new homes in the org chart. Cote&#8217; is spot-on with his application of Conway&#8217;s law to this problem. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyner Blain &#187; Agile Requirements</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2005/12/27/managing-requirements-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyner Blain &#187; Agile Requirements</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 07:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2005/12/27/managing-requirements-conversations/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>[...] Ultimately, it’s collaboration with the development team. And you have to rely on the developers to (be able to) tell you what assumptions they are making in their estimates / approaches. But unless they are really good - you also have to ask them. And for any non-trivial project, this means a ton of collaboration. And that’s a good thing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ultimately, it’s collaboration with the development team. And you have to rely on the developers to (be able to) tell you what assumptions they are making in their estimates / approaches. But unless they are really good &#8211; you also have to ask them. And for any non-trivial project, this means a ton of collaboration. And that’s a good thing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

