<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Telescopes, Microscopes, and Macro-scopes – How to View Requirements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tynerblain.com/blog/2005/11/26/telescopes-microscopes-and-macro-scopes-%e2%80%93-how-to-view-requirements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2005/11/26/telescopes-microscopes-and-macro-scopes-%e2%80%93-how-to-view-requirements/</link>
	<description>Software product success.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:39:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A requirements documentation mistake --Tyner Blain</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2005/11/26/telescopes-microscopes-and-macro-scopes-%e2%80%93-how-to-view-requirements/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>A requirements documentation mistake --Tyner Blain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2005/11/26/telescopes-microscopes-and-macro-scopes-%e2%80%93-how-to-view-requirements/#comment-144</guid>
		<description>[...] There were many mistakes made by many people. The one we&#8217;re talking about today has to do with documenting requirements at the right level of abstraction. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There were many mistakes made by many people. The one we&#8217;re talking about today has to do with documenting requirements at the right level of abstraction. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From MRD to PRD: The key to defining a spec --Tyner Blain</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2005/11/26/telescopes-microscopes-and-macro-scopes-%e2%80%93-how-to-view-requirements/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>From MRD to PRD: The key to defining a spec --Tyner Blain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2005/11/26/telescopes-microscopes-and-macro-scopes-%e2%80%93-how-to-view-requirements/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>[...] It can be a daunting task. First, we have to define what our customer needs. High level requirements are just requirements that are too vague or high-level to be directly actionable. &#8220;We must reduce our cost of fullfilling orders by 20%&#8221; is a high level requirement. We can&#8217;t start writing code with only that information. In an early post, we talked about functional requirements being written at the right level - don&#8217;t confuse the level of clarity required for writing a functional spec with that required to define goals. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It can be a daunting task. First, we have to define what our customer needs. High level requirements are just requirements that are too vague or high-level to be directly actionable. &#8220;We must reduce our cost of fullfilling orders by 20%&#8221; is a high level requirement. We can&#8217;t start writing code with only that information. In an early post, we talked about functional requirements being written at the right level &#8211; don&#8217;t confuse the level of clarity required for writing a functional spec with that required to define goals. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyner Blain &#187; Top five use case blunders</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2005/11/26/telescopes-microscopes-and-macro-scopes-%e2%80%93-how-to-view-requirements/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyner Blain &#187; Top five use case blunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 08:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2005/11/26/telescopes-microscopes-and-macro-scopes-%e2%80%93-how-to-view-requirements/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>[...] Inconsistency. All the use cases we write need to be at the same level (macro-scopic, not microscopic or telescopic) and use the same format (narrative versus list, formal versus informal). Managing sub-use cases versus use cases is part of getting the level right. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Inconsistency. All the use cases we write need to be at the same level (macro-scopic, not microscopic or telescopic) and use the same format (narrative versus list, formal versus informal). Managing sub-use cases versus use cases is part of getting the level right. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyner Blain &#187; Composition in requirements</title>
		<link>http://tynerblain.com/blog/2005/11/26/telescopes-microscopes-and-macro-scopes-%e2%80%93-how-to-view-requirements/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyner Blain &#187; Composition in requirements</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 07:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tynerblain.com/blog/2005/11/26/telescopes-microscopes-and-macro-scopes-%e2%80%93-how-to-view-requirements/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>[...] In Telescopes, Microscopes, and Macro-scopes…, I stressed the importance of writing requirements at the right level of detail to avoid ambiguity. There is also a huge benefit to being able to group a set of requirements and talk about them as a single entity. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In Telescopes, Microscopes, and Macro-scopes…, I stressed the importance of writing requirements at the right level of detail to avoid ambiguity. There is also a huge benefit to being able to group a set of requirements and talk about them as a single entity. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
